Zasphinctus chariensis

Quick Summary

• Difficulty: Expert
• Origin & Habitat: Known from Chad (type locality Moyen-Chari, Fort Archambault, now Sarh), Central African Republic, and Mali in the Afrotropical region. No habitat details are available ^[1].
• Colony Type: Unconfirmed – only male specimens have ever been documented. No queens or workers have been observed ^[1][2].
• Size & Growth:
  • Queen: Unknown – no queens have ever been documented
  • Worker: Unknown – no workers have ever been documented
  • Colony: Unknown
  • Growth: Unknown
  • Development: Unknown – no brood development has ever been studied (This species is known only from male specimens, no colony development data exists)
• Antkeeping:
  • Temperature: Unknown – no temperature data exists. Dorylinae army ants typically prefer warm tropical conditions, but this is an inference without species-specific confirmation.
  • Humidity: Unknown – no humidity data exists. Related army ants typically prefer humid conditions, but this is unconfirmed.
  • Diapause: Unknown – no seasonal data exists for this species
  • Nesting: Unknown – no nesting observations exist. Dorylinae typically nest in soil or rotting wood, but this is unconfirmed for this species
• Behavior: Unknown – no behavioral observations exist. Males are winged and presumably reproductive, but nothing else is known. Based on subfamily patterns, Dorylinae are typically predatory and nocturnal, but this is not confirmed for Zasphinctus chariensis ^[3].
• Common Issues: this species is essentially unknown in captivity – no established husbandry guidelines exist, only male specimens have ever been documented, meaning colony establishment from wild queens is impossible, no information exists on diet, making feeding recommendations impossible, the species may not be available in the antkeeping hobby at all due to its extreme rarity, any colony attempts would be entirely experimental with no established protocols

Why This Species Is So Poorly Known

Zasphinctus chariensis was described in 1915 by François Santschi from just two male specimens collected in Chad, and no additional specimens have been documented in over a century ^[1]. This is highly unusual – most ant species are known from workers, but this species is known only from males. The original collector was Decorse in 1904 at Fort Archambault (now Sarh) in Chad's Moyen-Chari region. The species has been moved through several genera (Sphinctomyrmex, Aethiopopone, and now Zasphinctus), but no new biological information has been added since its original description ^[1]. We have no idea what the workers look like, what they eat, how they nest, or anything about their colony structure.

What We Know About the Genus Zasphinctus

While Zasphinctus chariensis specifically is unknown, the genus Zasphinctus belongs to the Dorylinae subfamily, which contains army ants. These ants are typically predatory on other arthropods and use raiding behavior to capture prey. Dorylinae ants are found across tropical regions worldwide. The genus was revised in 2017 using X-ray micro-CT scanning, which allowed detailed examination of museum specimens, but that study could not add biological information for species known only from males ^[1]. Related genera include Dorylus (driver ants) and Aenictus (army ants), which are known for their massive colonies, nocturnal raiding, and subterranean nesting. However, Zasphinctus species may behave differently – we simply don't know for this genus or this species specifically.

Is This Species Available to Keepers?

This species is almost certainly not available in the antkeeping hobby. It is known from only a handful of male specimens collected over a century ago in one of the most poorly sampled regions for ants in Africa. No colony, queen, or worker has ever been collected. Even professional myrmecologists working in the region would struggle to locate it – it may already be extinct, or it may simply never have been collected in sufficient numbers. The antkeeping hobby typically works with species that have established captive breeding protocols and available stock. For Zasphinctus chariensis, neither exists. If you are interested in Dorylinae ants, consider more commonly kept army ant species like Dorylus or Aenictus, which have established care protocols and are available from reputable suppliers. ^[1]

Taxonomic History

The species has undergone multiple taxonomic changes since its initial description. Santschi originally described it in 1915 as Zasphinctus rufiventris st. chariensis (a subspecies of rufiventris) from male specimens collected in Chad ^[1]. Wheeler raised it to species status in 1922,and Santschi moved it to the genus Aethiopopone in 1930. Brown combined it into Sphinctomyrmex in 1975 and confirmed it as a full species. Finally, Borowiec moved it to Zasphinctus in 2016 during a generic revision of the Dorylinae subfamily ^[1]. Despite these changes spanning over a century, no new biological information has been added – the species remains known only from those two original male specimens.

Frequently Asked Questions

Report an Issue

The current care sheet is based fully on literature. See inconsistencies, or something that's incorrect? Please report here, it will be resolved after review from an admin. Contributing to the blogs tab also helps providing information, to make us be able to further improve the caresheets. Thank you for your support!

References